“Beauty has no size, no skin tone, no hair color, no eye color, no facial features, no muscle definition… For we are all uniquely beautiful, and the standards are unreal.” – Anonymous.
A woman reflects on how society’s perception of beauty continues to change over time, highlighting that these standards should never be seen as the ultimate truth. Throughout history, beauty ideals have shifted, with each decade introducing its own version of the “perfect” look that people try to emulate.
In the 1950s, the iconic Marilyn Monroe set the standard, making blonde hair and fair skin the epitome of beauty. Body shape was less emphasized, with more focus on soft, feminine features. Fast forward to the 1960s, and a youthful, almost high-school-like appearance became the trend. By the 1980s, the focus shifted to celebrating women with toned arms and curvier figures. However, the 1990s brought about an era that idolized extreme thinness, paired with clear, flawless skin.
Since the early 2000s, a new beauty standard has emerged, largely influenced by popular culture and even medical advancements. To be considered beautiful, a woman is often expected to have ample curves, including larger breasts, a rounder behind, a flat stomach, a slim waist, a thigh gap, and smooth, unblemished skin. Celebrities like Jennifer Lopez, Beyoncé, Kim Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner have become the faces of this ideal, regardless of whether their figures were achieved naturally or through other means.
Interestingly, while curvier figures have become more celebrated, the fashion and modeling industries continue to hold onto their preference for the ’90s ideals. The runway still favors exceptionally thin, tall women with striking facial features, exemplified by models such as Olga Sherer, Kim Noorda, and Kaia Gerber.
Yet, scientific research offers another perspective on what might be considered the “ideal” female body today. Researchers at the University of Texas suggest that, biologically speaking, the ideal woman would stand at around 5’5” tall and have measurements of 38.9 inches bust, 24.8 inches waist, and 35.8 inches hips. English model and actress Kelly Brooks perfectly matches these proportions. Despite early rejection from modeling agencies for not fitting the ultra-thin standard, Kelly’s naturally curvy figure has propelled her to international fame. Named the “sexiest woman alive” by FHM in 2005, she has maintained a thriving modeling career since her teenage years.
The significance of the 99-63-91 (bust-waist-hips) measurements is rooted in research indicating that men are naturally drawn to curvier women, as it subconsciously signals fertility and the ability to bear children. The phrase “childbearing hips” highlights this concept. Although fertility is influenced by various factors beyond body shape, studies have shown a link between certain body fat levels and reproductive health.
However, it’s essential to remember that beauty remains a highly personal and subjective experience. What one person finds attractive, another might not. In fashion, thin models are often chosen to showcase clothing, keeping the focus on the garments rather than the body underneath.
Ultimately, beauty should never be confined to the ever-changing societal standards. It is a diverse and subjective concept that encompasses all shapes, sizes, colors, and features. Embracing the uniqueness of every individual is vital because a world where everyone looks the same would lack excitement and creativity. Women should celebrate and take pride in their individual beauty, as true beauty cannot be defined by any single standard.
